Being the 22nd richest country in the world and with the 7th largest economy in Asia, international investors including blockchain companies have lots of interest in Taiwan. With security tokens proving to be a go-to option for most blockchain companies, Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission in July 2019 recognized the need to officially incorporate security token offering (STO) into the Securities and Exchange Act, which entails the regulatory framework for trading securities, by defining security tokens as securities.

According to the FSC, a security token is a cryptocurrency that is transferable and hold the following features:

  • The owners make capital contributions to the issuer
  • The owners invest in a common enterprise/project
  • The owners expect to receive profit depending on the efforts of the issuer or a third party.

The new Security Token Offering regulations

In January 2020, the FSC proposed deregulating STOs with an equivalent of up to NT$30 million. These STOs are characterized as “Exempt STO” in Paragraph 1 of Article 22 of the SEA. According to the article, these STOs are exempted from the obligation of reporting to the FSC.

Although the deregulation of STOs seemed to be a step in the right direction, the exemption comes with a tight set of restrictions. Additionally, the NT$30 million limit is relatively low, meaning that most of the STOs will not be exempted since most of them have targets above NT$30million.

However, the main objective behind the new regulations is to ensure that STOs in Taiwan are issued by regulated issuers and issued to professional Taiwan investors.

Issuer’s Qualifications

For a company or startup to issue security tokens in Taiwan, it has to be a company listed by shares, meaning it is incorporated per Taiwan’s Company Law.

For an STO to qualify for the exemption, the STOs must be conducted to on the same trading platform with the cumulative placements not exceeding the NT$30 million. The issuer must also ensure that the raised funds are denominated in the New Taiwan Dollar (NT$).

Additionally, the issuer should show the relevant issuance documents in an application to a security firm like the prospectus and security token application.

The prospectus, in particular, should include:

  • The Company Profile and Risks.
  • The Operation Overview.
  • The Operating Plan and Execution.
  • The Financial Overview.
  • An Expert’s Opinion on the Information Technology used in the issuance of the security token
  • Financial (non-certifying CPAs or securities underwriter) Expert’s Opinion about how reasonable the issuance price is.
  • Attorney’s opinion on whether the issuance of the security token complies with the set regulations and if the fundraising project adheres to the set legal rules.
  • Any other documents that should be disclosed and supplemented as per the securities firm notification.

The security firm that the issuers choose to use should have a securities dealer license.

Investors’ regulations

STO investors should be professional investors that qualify as per the criteria under paragraph 3 of Article 3 of the Offshore Structured Products regulations.

For the Exempt STO, the amount that a professional investor can subscribe should not exceed the limit of NT$300000.

Key Takeaways

For an STO to qualify for the “Exempt STO” it should target raising NT$30 million, which is equivalent to $1003764 USD. This is relatively low and means that most of the security token offerings will most likely not fall under the Exempt STO category. The Exempt STO category is however good for the small startups looking to raise a small capital.

Secondly, only professional investors as per the Offshore Structured Products regulations can participate in an STO. Also, the maximum amount that an investor can cash in cannot exceed NT$300,000 on a single STO.

Thirdly, STO funding is limited to the New Taiwan Dollar (NT$). This makes it increasingly difficult for foreign investors. Also, issuers cannot raise funds in other cryptocurrencies or USD as is the norm with most STOs.

Fourthly, an STO can only raise funds through one platform. Therefore, one STO cannot use different platforms to issue security tokens. Also, there is a limit to the number of STOs that can be accepted by each trading platform. This reduces market participation of STO issuers and operators of the trading platform.

Fifthly and lastly, there are many business restrictions and strict qualifications for security token trading platform operators.

Singapore is recognized as a pacesetter in blockchain and cryptocurrency due to its unfailingly supportive regulatory environment. Over the last few years, Singapore has seen a tremendous rise in the number of blockchain projects that have been registered within its borders.

To keep up with the evolving world of digital tokens, the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) published a guide on the e-Tax that details how digital token transactions including ICOs, IEOS and STOs shall be taxed. These came a few months after Singapore released its new regulations for enterprises offering payment services.

The guide focuses on the taxation of three types of digital tokens. These include security tokens, utility tokens and payment tokens (tokens used as payment options). The guide also elaborates on the taxation of other tokens that are distributed through unconventional means like hard forks and airdrops.

Payment tokens

According to the e-Tax guide, all transactions done using payment tokens shall be considered to be in the form of barter trade. Therefore, the recipients of the tokens shall be taxed depending on the value of the underlying goods or services.

Nonetheless, purchasing a payment token is not taxable. However, the returns from the disposal of the token are taxable if the process involved is a trading activity.

Payment tokens miners shall also be taxed if the mining intends to make profits.

Payment tokens distributed via hard forks and airdrops are not taxable if they are freely given out.

Utility tokens

According to the e-Tax guide, utility token transactions are not taxable since they are mainly acquired to enable the users to acquire future services within a specific blockchain network.

Security tokens

According to the e-Tax guide, security tokens are regarded as a form of equity or debt since they give owners an implied degree of control or equity to a certain asset or project. As such, the taxation of the returns gotten from security tokens depends on the type of the return. The types in consideration here are interests and dividends.

ICOs and STOs taxation

According to the IRAS, the proceeds of Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) and Security Token Offerings (STOs) shall be taxed depending on the functions and rights of the used token.

If the issued token is a utility token, the sale shall be considered to be in the form of revenue and is therefore taxable. This is because the utility token is an obligation for the issuer to provide a service or good in the future that shall be bought or paid for using this token.

On the other hand, the issuance of security tokens shall not be taxed since the proceeds parallel the proceeds obtained from issuance of equities or debts, which is normally capital in nature. However, as mentioned above, withholding tax obligation and the general income tax shall apply to the interest and dividends paid to the owners of the token.

Tokens set aside for founders in ICOs and STOs

In most cases, startups set aside some tokens for the founders. In this case, if the tokens are used to pay or compensate the founders, they are regarded as revenue and the founder that receives them shall be taxed. However, if the tokens are not issued as a form of payment, they are regarded as a capital asset of the founder.

What a taxpayer dealing with digital tokens in Singapore should do

IRAS instructs taxpayers in Singapore that deal with digital tokens to keep proper records of the digital token transactions so that it can be simple to file the returns.

The records should have the following:

  • Transaction date.
  • The number of tokens sold or received.
  • Value of the digital token at the time of transaction.
  • The used exchange rate.
  • Purpose of the transaction.
  • Details of the customers/suppliers in case it was a buy or sell transaction.
  • Details of the ICO or STO.
  • Invoices or Receipts of the expenses incurred within the business.

According to WeeTracker media firm, African startups raised about $1.3 billion from venture capital funding in 2019, which is an improvement from the past years. Nevertheless, startups in Africa still face enormous challenges when it comes to funding projects due to a lack of liquidity.

Blockchain technology could step into the gap and help startups especially in the emerging tech hubs like Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa to raise funds for their projects through blockchain-powered equity crowdfunding. Equity crowdfunding has helped revolutionize the way businesses raise funds from investors.

By adopting blockchain technology, startups do not have to go through the tedious process of getting their companies listed on the stock markets to sell their shares.

Why investors hesitate

In Africa, the ecosystem for doing business is still not that favourable for startups to achieve reasonable growth in a short time span. Most startups struggle to make ends meet due to factors like high taxes, which are common in many African countries. In some worst-case scenarios, some startups end up closing shops. This makes investors shy off from investing since they are not sure if they will live to get the returns.

Also, in Africa, secondary markets are scarce resulting in low market liquidity for investors to exit from investments. Venture capitals, for example, look for entrepreneurs that build sustainable businesses with promising exit opportunities. For a startup to win a venture capital investment, it has to have at least an IPO, merger, or some acquisitions, which are only possible if a startup achieves a certain level of growth.

To create the necessary liquidity, startups in Africa could adopt blockchain technology to enable them to tokenize their assets.

 How token-based financing increases market liquidity

By using blockchain, startups can create tokens (either utility or security tokens). They can then go ahead and sell the tokens through Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs), or Security Token Offering (STOs) for the case of security tokens.

Investors will find it safer to invest in startups by buying tokens since the tokens are easily traded in exchanges where the liquidity is high. If an investor purchases some tokens from a startup, and the startup succeeds to get the tokens listed on a cryptocurrency exchange, then the investor can trade the tokens and make some profits. In most cases, the price at which the tokens are listed on the crypto exchanges is usually higher than the price of the tokens during the initial offerings.

Therefore, an investor could decide to exit the market immediately the tokens of the startup get listed on an exchange.

Besides, since a good amount of investment in Africa comes from outside Africa, token financing offers the best opportunity to tap into the external sources. Blockchains are usually decentralized and they allow cheap and fast cross broader transfer of funds. Therefore, investors from any corner of the world can easily purchase the tokens of a startup in Africa without necessarily having to travel to a specific country or sign huge volumes of paper agreements.

Examples of African startups that have reaped big from token financing

Below are some startups that have raised funds through token financing by conducting ICOs, IEOs, and STOs.

  1. Golix

Golix, a Zimbabwean crypto exchange that was started in 2014. In 2018 Golix conducted an ICO that raised $23 million by offering their GLX token.

  1. BlockBank

The UK’s BlockBank that acquired some stake in Kenyan Spire Bank. BlockBank was able to raise about 12.8 million in its pre-ICO conducted in 2018.

  1. Wala

Wala, the “zero-fee money app” South African startup that was able to raise $1.2 million through an ICO conducted in 2019.

  1. Mazzuma

Mazzuma, a Ghanaian startup that was raised over $45,000 in its third token sale phase after successfully conducting a pre-phase, first phase, and a second phase.

Singapore has positioned itself as a financial hub not only in South East Asia but also in the whole world. Besides, it has also become a global crypto hub.

Most blockchain companies prefer registering their projects in Singapore due to the favorable cryptocurrency ecosystem there. As a result, Singapore has become home to some of the most innovative projects; the likes of CitiOS, and GeTS, among many other blockchain projects being implemented in almost every sector in Singapore.

The main reason why blockchain technology has thrived so much in Singapore is because the country has been able to maintain a reliably supportive regulatory environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain. The World Bank has ranked Singapore in the top three countries with Ease of Doing Business Index for over a decade. The government gives grants to companies to encourage them to adopt new emerging businesses and it also launched the Smart Nation Initiative in 2014 that aims at creating solutions that will transform the country using big data, networks and Infocomm technologies.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) also created a regulatory sandbox for financial Institutions to experiment with Fintech solutions. The sandbox relaxes some regulations for the industry.

Also, as some countries like China and South Korea limit the use of blockchain-based fundraising methods like Initial Coins (ICOs), Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs) and Security Token Offerings STOs), Singapore has literary encouraged the industry to grow. This has made it possible for startups to easily fund their blockchain projects, which in turn offer solutions to some of the needs that Singapore and the world at whole may have.

IEOs in Singapore

In 2019, Singapore played host to over 28 IEOs out of the about 100 IEOs that were conducted globally. This positioned Singapore as a global leader in IEOs. The second country, the United States of America, only played host to about 11 IEOs. China hosted 9 IEOs, the United Kingdom hosted 7, South Korea Hosted 4, the Cayman Islands hosted 3, Estonia hosted 3, Estonia hosted 3, Switzerland hosted 3, Germany hosted 2 and Malta hosted 2.

The 28 IEOs that were conducted within Singapore’s boundaries raised over $188 million, which is quite a large amount for a single country. This success is greatly attributed to the fact that several cryptocurrency exchanges like Binance are finding their way into Singapore. Besides, Singapore has its cryptocurrency exchange the Huobi Global that has an IEO Launchpad by the name Huobi Prime.

And out of the total amount that was raised through IEOs, over 50% of that amount was raised through the top five cryptocurrency exchanges that include Huobi and Binance among the likes of Gate.io, Okex, and Bittrex.

2020 Projection

The IEO industry in 2020 kicked off with a boom with Biki.com crypto exchange, a Singapore-based exchange joined the league of IEO issuers by announcing its first IEO in February.

With the emergence of new IEO exchange launchpads based in Singapore, and the rush by some of the most renowned exchanges to gain access to the Singaporean market, we could see an even higher number of IEOs being raised in Singapore in 2020 compared to 2019.

Launching a successful Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) is simple if done correctly.

Initial Exchange Offering mode of fundraising was invented after Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) proved to be hectic to regulate, and thus becoming a playfield for scammers. The IEOs, however, retained the basic framework of the ICOs but placing the process of the token issuance/sale on the hands of cryptocurrency exchange platforms. That is why IEOs are sometimes referred to as ICOs that are issued on cryptocurrency exchanges.

Although IEOs were intended to solve the issue of safety with the ICOs, IEOs ended up introducing lots of other advantages for the token issuers. Some of these advantages include:

  • Trust

An IEO instills trust into your potential investors. The token crowdsale is conducted through a cryptocurrency exchange and investors/ users believe that the exchange properly vets any token issuer before agreeing to sell the tokens to its users. Besides, exchanges are in business and if they allow a scam project to conduct an IEO thought their platform, it could greatly harm their reputation; therefore they have to be vigilant in cross-checking the projects behind the IEO.

A good example of how careful exchanges are when listing IEOs is the recent case where Bittrex, one of the most famous crypto exchanges in the world, canceled the RAID IEO after suspicion of fraudulent activities following the termination of a partnership between OP.GG. (a data analytics company) and RAID.

Therefore, if your IEO gets listed on an exchange, investors will have some trust that your project is not a scam and it could become a success in the future.

  • Security

When issuing an IEO, you do not have to worry about managing the AML/KYC since the crypto exchange handles all that.

  • Easy

Once you have accomplished the hard part of creating a token, doing the tokenomics, and writing the white paper, the rest is left to the exchanges.

Also, you do not require to conduct a lot of marketing and roadshows compared to the ICOs, since the exchange where the IEO is listed already has some users who will get interested in your IEO.

  • Token Listing

There is nothing more precious than to see your project’s token listed on a crypto exchange for trading. It is a painful reality that quite a number of projects that have conducted token crowdsale struggle to have their tokens listed on exchanges.

However, for an IEO the token is easily listed on the same exchange where the IEO was issued since the exchange had already vetted the project before.

Examples of successful IEOs that have been conducted

The first projects that conducted taken crowdsale through IEOs were Bread and GIFTO, which conducted their IEOs in 2017 just after IEO was invented.

IEOs then embarked on a journey to fame that culminated in 2019, during which a number of projects carried out very successful IEOs within record-breaking timeframes.

Some of these projects include:

Steps to launching your successive IEO

Hitting the anticipated target with your IEO is the dream of every blockchain startup or company that launches an IEO. However, to do that, you have to follow through all the necessary steps.

We shall go through the entire process of launching an IEO step by step.

1.      Work on your blockchain project

Remember you are raising funds for your project. Therefore, you have to have a concrete blockchain project that at least seeks to solve a particular problem.

Also, your project should be viable with the prospects of being implemented in the foreseeable near future. A good project idea should include a progressive business model, the use of breakthrough technologies and also have a strong team of experts.

2.      Token Economics (Tokenomics)

This is a very critical step and you should hire experts to do this for you.

Most exchanges prefer issuing utility tokens to get off the hook of being required to apply for the strict regulations that go with issuing security tokens. As a matter of fact, most of the exchanges will require a legal opinion that concludes that the token is a utility token. Therefore, you should ensure that the token that you create for your project is a utility token.

However, if you prefer to create a security token, you should be ready to look for a securities exchange that is registered and authorized to conduct the sale of security tokens. You should also be ready to adhere to the strict rules that go with issuing securities.

3.      Whitepaper

The whitepaper explains your blockchain project, the tokenomics of your project and how you intend to distribute the funds collected through the IEO within the project. Therefore, you should hire a professional to draft and write the whitepaper for you.

Some of the most important parts of a whitepaper are:

  • Legal disclaimer
  • An executive summary of your project
  • The problem statement
  • Overview of the project
  • Description, use cases, advantages and usefulness of the created product/technology
  • Financial model of the project
  • Market analysis
  • Token economics (Tokenomics)
  • Roadmap
  • Team members
  • Partners

The whitepaper should demonstrate to the potential investors why they should invest in the project by purchasing the tokens being issued through the IEO.

The team members should also be well listed alongside their qualifications and contact information.

4.      Marketing

To reach as many prospective investors as possible, you should embark on good marketing strategies. Also, the stronger your project is the high the chances that you will get a strong exchange to launch your IEO.

Some of the marketing strategies that you could employ include:

  • Social media marketing – LinkedIn, Facebook page, Twitter, Telegram chats, and Medium.
  • Community management – You should work at generating as much hype as possible around the project on different forums. Some of the best platforms to use include Reddit threads, Bitcointalk threads, Medium, and Telegram chats, so on.
  • Press Releases – these should work at explaining the advantages of your project and also creating awareness of the coming IEO.

5.      Finding the right cryptocurrency exchange for the IEO Launch

Once the project, tokenomics, and whitepaper are done, you will have to diligently choose the cryptocurrency exchange platform to use for your IEO.

When choosing an exchange, you should consider whether the exchange is registered to operate in your country or region. Regulated exchanges always hold the front seat in the hearts of cryptocurrency investors. Therefore, launching your IEO on a registered exchange is an added advantage. You also avoid the risk of getting your IEO interrupted by legal case battles.

You should also do a background check to find out about its reputation; whether it has been involved in irregularities in the past and if any, how it resolved them.

Some of the cryptocurrency exchanges that are known to conduct IEOs are:

  • Binance
  • Huobi Prime
  • Bittrex
  • BitMax
  • KuCoin
  • Liquid
  • IDAX
  • CoinBene
  • Latoken
  • OKEx
  • Exmarkets
  • ProBit

Once you identify the cryptocurrency exchange where you want your IEO launched, you should approach the exchange’s listing team. The listing teams of most of the exchanges are can be approached through their agencies or partners.

The conditions set by the listing teams vary from one exchange to the other and you should be keen to identify what is required for the exchange you have chosen. For instance, different exchanges ask for different fees; to some, it could be a percentage of the amount received from the token sale while in others it is a standard listing fee while others ask for both.

The listing team will also require enough information about your project. Therefore, they are going to review the entire project to understand the current stage of the project development, the readiness of the token for the sale, the team and the potential of the project to succeed.

Most importantly, exchanges require a legal opinion on your token.

Legal opinion

The legal opinion is a legally abiding document that concludes that the token of your project is a utility token. Different exchanges have different requirements for the legal opinions and you should enquire about what your specific exchange requires from you.

To get a legal opinion, you should contact a legal company that is recommended or trusted by the exchange that you chose. The legal company will then take you through the necessary legal procedure.

Once you are cleared by the legal company, the IEO goes ahead and launches your IEO.

However, it is important to note that the exchange can still cancel the IEO before the set start date in case they realize some anomalies.

Post IEO launching

IEOs generally take a short duration of time to hit the target amounts. Some IEOs have less than 1 minute in the past to sell out.

So, after holding a successful IEO, you should concentrate on ensuring that your project achieves the objectives you have highlighted in the whitepaper following the developed roadmap. Hitting the milestones on the Roadmap gives investors hope that your project is headed for success.

You should also embark on ensuring that the collected funds are distributed as stated in the whitepaper so that they can go into the proper use in the project.

Access to capital is essential for Fintech companies looking to embark on rapid growth. However, the available traditional fundraising methods have lots of drawbacks that hinder Fintech companies from realizing their full potential.

Most of the traditional fundraising methods rely on middlemen, who end up making the process too expensive. Also, the process involves a lot of paperwork, which ends up slowing down the whole process.

The rapid evolution being witnessed in the cryptocurrency and blockchain arena has stepped up the efforts of removing intermediaries from most business transactions. The invention of blockchain-based fundraising methods like Security Token Offerings (STOs) has completely revolutionized the way fintech startups and companies engage their customers in raising funds.

Security Token Offerings have stood out among the blockchain-based fundraising methods and offered great competition to methods such as the Initial public offerings which are quite expensive due to reliance on middlemen.

Security Token Offerings within the Fintech industry

Security Token Offerings (STOs) issue security tokens, which are digital financial products that experts and analysts believe could replace the way everything is conducted in the future. Despite being secure and highly liquid (making them easier to buy and sell), they have also provided a better opportunity for transparency and oversight among investors, businesses and regulators.

Security tokens have provided an avenue for digitizing almost anything in the world. A host of industries, among them the real estate industry, and the capital markets, among many others, have seized the opportunity by tokenizing their assets and offering them as security tokens.

Security tokens can easily be offered through smart contracts or STOs.

While STOs allow the Fintech startups and companies to net serious investors, the investors also benefit since the STOs makes it easier for them to monitor the performance of their portfolios. STOs are also easily regulated since the security tokens have an added layer that makes them able to comply with regulations.

Investors who purchase security tokens through STOs are entitled to a given stake, voting entitlements or dividends in the company.

Some of the STOs that have stolen the show recently include that of AssetBlock, a real estate investment firm that has embarked on tokenizing about $60 million worth of exclusive hotels in partnership with a luxury hotel asset manager, for investors to cash in.

There is also another case in Manchester, UK, where a luxury residential development it tokenizing about $25 million worth of assets on Tezos blockchain, with a plan to tokenize over $600 million real estate within the United Kingdom.

Comparing STOs to other blockchain-based fundraising methods

STOs are among several other models for fundraising blockchain projects, among them Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) and Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs). Among the three, STOs have stood out after gaining prominence following the regulatory issues facing ICOs.

Initially, ICOs were the go-to fundraising option since they were very simple to orchestrate and required no regulations at all. However, scammers noticed the loophole and started issuing fake ICOs to milk vulnerable investors, thus making investors keep off from them or at least be very careful when participating in one.

The fall away of ICOs saw the invention of the IEOs, which are safer compared to the ICOs. However, most IEOs do not offer security tokens due to the strict restriction that goes with offering security tokens. In the US for example, if an IEO offers security tokens, the IEO should be issued through a registered/regulated securities exchange and the company behind the IEO should disclose adequate information about its business, the token sale as well as the terms of the token sale.

Therefore, though IEOs solved the issue of safety with ICOs, it hasn’t been able to attend to the need of the evolving trend among most Fintech companies to use security tokens instead of using utility tokens. Security tokens are best issued through STOs.

As a result, Fintech companies and startups are opting to run STOs even though they are more involving compared to the ICOs and IEOs. And since the STO landscape is persistently evolving, companies are forced to constantly conduct in-depth market research to thoroughly understand the anticipations of their target audience.

 

Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs), which were introduced following the decline of Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) popularity among blockchain startups and investors, have gone on to become a force to reckon with within the blockchain crowdfunding industry. IEOs are said to be more trustworthy compared to the ICOs.

IEOs are much safer compared to the ICOs and at the same time much easier to run compared to the STOs, which are the safest.

Some of the things that make IEOs a darling among blockchain token issuers and investors are:

  1. Trust

The fact that IEOs are issued on exchanges brings a sense of centralization in IEOs. This in return has brought trust among investors since they see exchanges as secure platforms due to the regulations that they have to adhere to offer their services.

  1. Efficient token listing after the token sale

Contrary to the ICOs where the issuers (the team behind the blockchain project) would be responsible for approaching exchanges to have their tokens listed, Tokens issued through IEOS are easily listed by the same exchange that issued them.

Therefore, investors are guaranteed that it shall not take long before they start selling the purchased tokens on the exchange.

  1. Ease of raising funds

Since IEOs are issued through exchanges that already have registered users, the IEO issuers are guaranteed that they shall get a vast customer base without much advertising as is the case with ICOs.

Also, the IEO issuers do not have to worry about things like AML/KYC. The exchange platform issuing the tokens takes care of that.

  1. Speed of sale

We cannot forget to mention that due to the large influx of ready investors in exchanges, IEOs take a very short time to hit their targets. There have been cases where it has only taken a few seconds for the target to be hit.

  1. Protection from regulatory consequences

Contrary to ICOs where the startups or companies behind the ICOs are the ones responsible for the legal obligations of the token issuing, Exchange platforms have well organized legal frameworks that deal with the legal consequences of the IEO.

However, there are some legal compliances that the startup or company behind the IEO should adhere to and it at times requires the help of an IEO consultancy or advisory firm to maneuver these regulations. Some exchanges go the extra mile of providing legal advice to startups.

Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs) regulations

Having evolved from ICOs, which have no provision for legal compliance, IEOs still face the challenge of fitting in the various legal provisions within the various state regulatory authorities.

Of essence, the Team behind an IEO must work diligently to ensure that they developed the right kind of a token. In most cases, IEOs are not after security tokens unless the development team ants the token to be a security token. Therefore, the development team must work within the given regulations to ensure that the token that they develop does not fall under securities. To do so, it is advisable to consult with a reputable IEO advisory firm like Gravitas International so that they can guide you through the legal handles within your country and region. Besides passing the legal handles within your locality, it will also be paramount to adhere to the legal obligations within the countries or regions within which your target audience is.

In some countries like the USA, if the token being issued falls under securities, then the startup or team behind the IEO must look for a securities exchange to list the IEO. Besides, the startup or company behind the IEO shall be subjected to the registration requirements of offerings that fall under the securities laws. If the tokens are securities, the company or startup shall be required to make some important disclosures about its business, the terms of token offering, itself and also about the digital asset it is offering.

If the token does not fall under securities, the startup or company offering the IEO only has to look for a registered exchange where the IEO can be issued. In countries like the USA, such exchanges are normally registered as brokers and must be registered with the SEC and be members of FINRA.

With blockchain security tokens garnering interest throughout the world, Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), the French regulator has seen an opportunity that the rest of the European nations should not miss. The AMF recommends that the European nations should create a European digital lab or sandbox that should enable the nations to ease the legal regulations governing security tokens.

Security tokens are known to be the most regulated digital products in the cryptocurrency and blockchain industry. The reason being that the security tokens fall under securities, although they are digital tokens. Therefore, they are subject to the regulations that govern both the cryptocurrencies or digital assets and those that govern securities.

Other countries like China have also suggested allowing security token offerings under a sandbox mechanism.

AMF’s legal review on security tokens

The French regulator recognizes that security tokens have gained a lot of interest across the world. Both incumbents and blockchain ecosystems seem to gracefully embrace security tokens. The IMF looks at tokenization as an accepted step towards the automation of most financial/trade processes.

The French regulator explored two legal facets in its report on security tokens. The first facet deals with the issue and sale of the security tokens. The second deals with the inclusion of security tokens in investment funds.

Normally, there are no regulatory impediments when it comes to including security tokens as investment funds, either in France or any other European nation. The only thing that asset managers that deal with security tokens should do is to apply for a license with the AMF.

The main issue lies with the issue and sale of the security tokens, especially through Security Token Offerings (STOs). For the case of centralized Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) platforms there are no challenges since the involved parties can comply with the already set licensing requirements.

However, when it comes to decentralized blockchain projects it is quite challenging for the token issuers and sellers since it is difficult to identify a manager. Concerning this, the AMF suggested an outlined a proposal where parties can list buy and sell orders without requiring the endorsement under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2004/39/EC) (MiFID 2 Directive), which has been in effect since November 2007 among European Union nations.

AMF’s suggestion on the issue and sale of security tokens

Currently, the legislation of a security token issue and sale requires a central securities depository.

AMF suggests that the creation of a sandbox or digital lab would allow regulators in the various counties in the European Union to wave certain regulatory requirements. However, it suggests that this should be done as a trade-off.

According to the AMF’s suggestion, the applicant can only be given a waiver or exemption if they are compliant with key regulatory ethics giving the regulators a higher oversight role.

Earlier on, the AMF had released a working document that sought to inspire the European Commission to create a European digital lab that can deal with the financial services around security tokens.

The French regulator is set to release several other papers in support of its security token research in the coming days or months. Most importantly, the regulator recommends that the use of intermediaries in an age where blockchain technology is available is outdated. The AMF would, therefore, like to see the use of more technologically oriented approaches which gives public adoption of blockchain technology a green light.

A few months ago, Polymath one of the most reputable security token offering platforms decided to move its Polymesh Blockchain platform from Ethereum to Parity Substrate, a platform that was developed by Parity Applied Sciences that is owned by Gavin Wooden, who was Ethereum’s co-founder.

This came just a few months after introducing Polymesh, which is a security token specific blockchain. Polymesh was initially built on Ethereum and Polymath had also gone ahead and built an SDK (a suite of developer tools for security token issuers and white-labellers) that want to issue security tokens on Ethereum.

Reason for migrating

The main reason for the fallout is the fact that Ethereum uses proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism, which does not go well with security tokens, though it plans to upgrade to proof-of-stake (PoS).

Adam Dossa, the head of Polymath’s blockchain, had earlier stated in a telephone interview that though Ethereum has some great attributes, the world of regulated security tokens is quite different from that of Ethereum. Dossa was quick to identify that PoW posses a serious problem known as block reorgs where blocks of data containing transaction information can be rolled again to annul a disputed transaction.

Dossa also touched on the way Ethereum settles transactions, saying that since it uses mining to settle its transactions and miners can operate from any location in the world, establishments dealing with securities could be scrutinized by authorities if the charges paid to the miners are traced to a nation that is already sanctioned.

What did the migration mean?

By changing the platform on which its products are built on, Polymath decided to embark on a journey to migrate its ST20 security token development standard, which was initially constructed through Ethereum’s ERC-1400 token standard, to Parity Substrate. Besides, Polymath also had to migrate its token, the POLY (which is an ERC-20 token) from Ethereum to Parity Substrate.

Adam Dossa, however, stated via an email that they shall maintain a bridge for the POLY token for at least one year.

On their part, Parity agreed to develop a sure business-logic option on the base layer of Ploymesh. It shall also construct decent runtime and contract communication modules.

Why Substrate?

The head of Polymath’s blockchain stated that other candidates had been considered before settling on Substrate. One of the Candidates was Hyperledger Cloth among others.

However, Dossa described Parity Substrate as a “modular, versatile framework”. He also pointed out that it is simple to construct good contracts from the bottom up on Substrate, which is a great thing for Polymesh.

Parity Substrate has offered solutions to a number of consensus mechanisms in the past, some of which are even customized. Also, transactions performed via Substrate are final and cannot be undone.

The current COVID-19 pandemic is threatening to bring the world to a standstill. Everybody, famous or infamous, rich or poor, has currently been rendered equal in fear. Governments in America, Asia, Europe, Middle-East and Africa are going for a total lockdown to try and stop the spread of this killer virus that has claimed thousands of lives around the world and still spreading like bush fire.

Many businesses have closed shops in these difficult times. Others have opted for unorthodox means to try and stay relevant while hoping and praying for the return of better days.

However, for the FinTech industry, it is a race against time to try and offer solutions to the COVID-19 pandemic using Blockchain technology.

Blockchain technology has been hailed as the mother of all inventions in the 21st century. It has offered numerous solutions to many problems that have affected humankind over the ages. Currently, almost all departments ranging from, infrastructure, healthcare, transport, communication, and sports have adopted blockchain technology.

WHO launches a blockchain platform to Fight COVID-19 in partnership with blockchain and tech companies

With the COVID-19 Pandemic unfolding too fast for institutions and governments to keep track of the data concerning the Pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) in partnership with tech and blockchain companies launched a blockchain platform called Mipasa that would help in sharing information on the coronavirus.

Mipasa is based on distributed ledger technology (DLT). Its main purpose is to help in the early detection of those infected with the COVID-19 especially in the infection hotspots.

The companies involved in the development of the platform include Hacera, an enterprise blockchain platform, Microsoft, an IT corporation, IBM, a technology company and Oracle a computer firm.

The fact that the platform uses blockchain technology makes the shared information full-proof to doctoring. The platform shall also facilitate private sharing of information between individuals, health institutions and organizations as well as state authorities. Therefore the patient’s privacy is guaranteed.

According to the platform’s official website:

“MiPasa can help monitor and foresee local and global epidemiological trends and detect likely asymptomatic carriers by feeding big data on infection routes and occurrences to powerful AI processors around the world.”

The platform has also received backing from several state health institutions including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Europe, the US, and China. The Department of Health of Hong Kong, China’s National Health Commission and the Government of Canada have also offered to contribute to the project.

UAE’s Ministry of Community Development (MOCD) is also adopting DLT-based solutions

The Ministry of Community Development (MOCD) in the United Arab Emirates has also been reported to adopt DLT-based solutions to facilitate the work from home situation.  DLT shall make it possible for the distribution of official documents and identity verification, thus allowing the customers to engage with the MOCD at the comfort of their homes.

Blockchain proposed as the best means for the US to distribute the stimulus package

There are suggestions that the United States Government should consider using blockchain technology, especially DLT to distribute the stimulus package that the government intends to give. Experts have suggested that the US could launch a “digital dollar” based on the DLT.

China also using DLT to censor the spread of the Virus

China which was the starting point for the Coronavirus pandemic deployed blockchain in a number of areas in its efforts to fight the virus. It has adopted DLT to track the spread of the virus, distribute medical supplies, monitor health records and also distribute charity donations.

Could blockchain help in winning the fight against COVID-19?

It shall only be a matter of time before we get the real answer to this question. However, governments, institutions, organizations, and individuals have adopted the use of blockchain technology as the fight against COVID-19 intensifies.

There are reports that over one million personal computer users have donated their processing power to a distributed computing project being referred to as Folding@Home that is working on the simulation of protein dynamics, to find out therapies that can be used for the COVID-19 patients.

There are also reports that Bitcoin users and miners have also joined in the fight. A group of Bitcoin users calling themselves “CoroHope” are said to be working on a coronavirus vaccine.